A practical workflow that keeps a person in charge
A reasonable structure looks like this: define the question first (is this company's margin trend real or a one-time item, is this sector rotation or noise), then use software to gather the relevant primary documents—filings, transcripts, official data releases—rather than secondhand summaries of them. Use a language tool to produce a first-pass summary or flag specific passages worth closer reading, but treat that summary as a draft, not a conclusion. Cross-check anything numeric against the actual source document before it factors into a decision, since even well-regarded models can misstate specific figures confidently. Only after that verification step does the information become part of an actual investment decision, ideally documented with the reasoning written down so it can be reviewed later against what actually happened. This last step—writing down why a decision was made, not just what was decided—is what makes it possible to tell, months later, whether the process itself was sound, independent of whether that particular call happened to work out.